How Henkel adhesives contribute to green construction

1. The production of steel and concrete generates large amounts of CO₂. Wood poses an environmentally friendly construction material alternative. Why?

Christian Fild: The benefit of wood as a construction material is that it causes less CO₂ emissions during production. Wood does not have to be produced in blast furnaces or combustion plants or has to be extracted from the ground resulting in high energy consumption. It grows in nature and only needs soil, water, light and air. But it also binds CO₂ from the atmosphere, at least while the wood is in use. Construction companies are starting to design buildings that can be taken apart and reprocessed. Large floor or wall elements, for example, are reused as construction products or furniture panels, which in turn can one day be made into chipboards. At the very end, after ideally more than 100 years of use, the wood will be thermally recycled. This is referred to as cyclical timber management. 

2. Why was wood replaced by other construction materials for a long time?

Christian Fild: Wood is actually the original building material. Just think back a few thousand years. Houses were mostly built of wood or clay. Steel and concrete were introduced about 150 years ago. Both are very suitable construction materials, concrete especially due to its moisture resistance. These days, foundations are built in concrete and when it comes to high-rise buildings, steel is definitely the most suitable construction material, because it offers great stability and high rigidity. Every construction material has its place. For a long time, however, it was easy, cheap and also customary to use steel and concrete. Until 15 or 20 years ago, no one really cared about CO₂ emissions produced during construction. The ever-increasing awareness of environmental issues as well as the sustainable use of available resources has changed that. However, only in the last 20 years has the technology of wooden construction advanced to a level that has made it genuinely competitive.

3. Which kind of advancements are those, for example?

Christian Fild: If you look at old half-timbered houses, you can see that the buildings last for a very long time, but after a while they become a bit crooked and deformed because the wood is constantly changing. About 20 years ago, cross-laminated timber was "invented". The multilayer solid wood panels provide a very high load-bearing capacity and stability. Even more interesting is the fact that wood is more suitable for constructing prefabricated buildings compared to steel and concrete. When you use wood, it can be prefabricated in factories and then simply be assembled at the construction site. You can manufacture much more precisely in factories than you could on site, which means that fewer errors occur. Instead of taking two months to build on site, a wooden building can therefore be completed in two weeks. This also results in significant cost savings.

4. Are our resources sufficient to replace steel and concrete with wood in the long term?

Christian Fild: Yes, because the resources grow back. That is the big difference between wood and concrete or steel. There is enough woodland to supply wooden construction. Of course, sustainable management is essential and it is not acceptable to simply cut down forests. But I would like to emphasize that steel and concrete also play their part in construction. One is not superior to the other. The materials should be used according to where they make the most sense. Today, there are also many hybrid wooden buildings for which the benefits of all construction materials are essential.

This is where Henkel adhesives play a key role